Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Company B, 2-124 Infantry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This is an extremely unlikely search term so there is no value in preserving as a redirect. A Train^talk 19:20, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Company B, 2-124 Infantry

Company B, 2-124 Infantry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a company-level sub-unit that is not independently notable as most sources are primary and secondary sources appear to be too closely associated with the subject. Doesn't meet WP:MILUNIT as below battalion level. Merge relevant details then redirect to 124th Infantry Regiment (United States). Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:28, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:34, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:34, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

• Merge to 124th Infantry Regiment (United States). This company isn't particularly notable and definitely should not have a standalone entry.Icewhiz (talk) 06:49, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
• Merge.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:51, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:10, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:08, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

• Merge (or just redirect - not sure which) to 124th. This is much too low a level of unit to merit an article of its own, save exceptionally. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:10, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
• Delete - This thing does not meet WP:MILUNIT and is puffed up by citing platoon-level deployments and the names of non-notable company grade officers.--Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 19:19, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
• Delete. I cant see what would even be appropriate for merging DGG ( talk ) 06:12, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable as stand alone article; local trivia; with redirect of the name to 124th. Kierzek (talk) 13:35, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.